• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Transfusion News
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Adverse Events (non-infectious)
    • Blood Donation
    • Cell Therapy
    • Coagulation & Plasma Transfusion
    • Platelet Transfusion
    • Policy and Guidelines
    • Quality Control and Regulatory
    • RBC Transfusion
    • Serology/Genotyping
    • Special Transfusion Situations
    • Transfusion Transmitted Infections
  • Continuing Education
  • Archives
  • Podcasts
  • Question of the Day
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts
  • Follow us on
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts

Liberal Transfusion Thresholds for Patients with Acute Brain Injury

October 17, 2024

Over the past 25 years, >45 randomized clinical trials have shown that a restrictive transfusion strategy is best for most patients, except those with myocardial infarctions. Patients with acute brain injuries represent another unique subgroup who may benefit from more liberal transfusion thresholds, as cerebrovascular autoregulation limits the brain’s ability to compensate for reduced cardiac output, making it particularly vulnerable to hypoxia. However, few studies have specifically examined transfusion thresholds in neurocritically ill patients, and clinical practices vary widely. To elucidate the optimal transfusion thresholds for patients with traumatic brain injuries—aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage—researchers randomized 850 patients (mean age, 51 years; 46% women; median hemoglobin [Hb], 8.5 g/dL) in 22 countries one-to-one to either a liberal transfusion threshold (<9 g/dL Hb) or restrictive threshold (<7 g/dL Hb) over 28 days. During the study, 90% of the patients in the liberal arm were transfused compared to 48% in the restrictive arm. Six months after randomization, 63% of patients in the liberal arm had an unfavorable neurological outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-5 or death) compared to 73% patients in the restrictive arm (adjusted relative risk, 0.86 [95% C.I., 0.79 to 0.94]; P=0.002). Furthermore, the incidence of having a cerebral ischemic event was lower in patients in the liberal arm (8.8%) compared to patients in the restrictive arm (13.5%), but mortality rates were similar in both arms. Based on this large, randomized trial, liberal transfusion thresholds may be considered for patients with acute brain injury, though further research is needed to confirm these results.

References:

  1. Turgeon AF, Lauzier F. Shifting Balance of the Risk-Benefit of Restrictive Transfusion Strategies in Neurocritically Ill Patients—Is Less Still More? Published online October 09, 2024
  2. Taccone FS, Rynkowski Bittencourt C, Møller K, et al. Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. Published online October 09, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.20424

Filed Under

  • News
  • RBC Transfusion

Recommended

  • High-Throughput Sequencing Used To Identify Pathogens in Donated Blood

  • Transfusion of Red Blood Cells from Younger Donors Is Not Associated with Improved Survival

  • Global Burden of Sickle Cell Anemia

Show Comments

Comments on this article are closed.

Get the latest news. Subscribe to our mailing list. Sign Up

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • New Erythropoietin Gene Variants Linked to Hereditary Erythrocytosis

  • Multifaceted Threats to the Blood Supply from Climate Change

  • Distinct Roles for Differently Aged Platelets

  • Anemia Treatment Bundle Improves Hemoglobin Recovery after Critical Illness

    Question of the Day

    Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Privacy Policy

    Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies Wiley