• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Transfusion News
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Adverse Events (non-infectious)
    • Blood Donation
    • Cell Therapy
    • Coagulation & Plasma Transfusion
    • Platelet Transfusion
    • Policy and Guidelines
    • Quality Control and Regulatory
    • RBC Transfusion
    • Serology/Genotyping
    • Special Transfusion Situations
    • Transfusion Transmitted Infections
  • Continuing Education
  • Archives
  • Podcasts
  • Question of the Day
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts
  • Follow us on
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts

Cost Effectiveness of Platelets Treated with Pathogen Reduction Compared to Secondary Testing

October 4, 2017

In March of 2016 the FDA introduced draft guidelines recommending additional precautions to prevent bacterial contamination in platelets. Since both the INTERCEPT pathogen reduction (PR) technology and the Verax platelet PGD Test (for rapid bacterial detection) are approved for use in the United States, researchers compared the cost-effectiveness of treating platelets with each of these tests.  Use of the platelet PGD Test extends the shelf life of platelets from 5 to 7 days, which was included in the model.  PR platelets cost $221 more per unit than platelets assessed with the PGD Test.  Higher costs of PR platelets can be attributed to the higher cost of the inactivation technology, lower therapeutic effectiveness, an increased need for additional transfusions, and fewer storage days.  The model, however, did not incorporate the economic benefits of inactivation of other transfusion-transmissible pathogens such as HIV, HCV, HBV, West Nile, Plasmodium species and other emerging pathogens by PR except for the Zika virus, nor did the model incorporate possible extension of the shelf-life by PR treated platelets.  Transfusing facilities, which also may perform a second bacterial culture approximately 3 days after collection, should weigh all costs and benefits to decide which method of testing is best for their establishment.

References:

  1. Li JW, Brecher ME, Jacobson JL et al. Addressing the risk of bacterial contamination in platelets: a hospital economic perspective. Transfusion 2017; 57; 2321-2328.
  2. Bloch EM. Residual risk of bacterial contamination: what are the options? Transfusion 2017; 57; 2289-2292.

Filed Under

  • News
  • Platelet Transfusion
  • Quality Control and Regulatory

Recommended

  • Coagulopathy in Patients with COVID-19—Interim Guidance from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

  • A New Drug for Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

  • FDA Guidance to Control for Bacterial Contamination in Platelets

Show Comments

Comments on this article are closed.

Get the latest news. Subscribe to our mailing list. Sign Up

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • New Guidelines for Platelet Transfusion Recommend Restrictive Strategies

  • Directed Blood Donations Should be Limited

  • Babesia Infection Reduces Red Cell Deformability

  • New Erythropoietin Gene Variants Linked to Hereditary Erythrocytosis

    Question of the Day

    Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Privacy Policy

    Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies Wiley