• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Transfusion News
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Adverse Events (non-infectious)
    • Blood Donation
    • Cell Therapy
    • Coagulation & Plasma Transfusion
    • Platelet Transfusion
    • Policy and Guidelines
    • Quality Control and Regulatory
    • RBC Transfusion
    • Serology/Genotyping
    • Special Transfusion Situations
    • Transfusion Transmitted Infections
  • Continuing Education
  • Archives
  • Podcasts
  • Question of the Day
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts
  • Follow us on
  • Search
  • Subscribe to Email Alerts

Luspatercept versus Epoetin Alfa for Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

July 12, 2023

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are caused by a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders and can progress to acute myeloid leukemia.  Along with RBC transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), such as epoetin alfa, are the standard of care for patients with lower-risk MDS with anemia.  Luspatercept, another ESA, has been approved after epoetin alfa treatment failure for these patients.  To assess the safety and efficacy of luspatercept as a first line ESA in adults with lower-risk MDS requiring at least two RBC transfusions every 8 weeks, the phase 3 COMMANDS randomized controlled trial enrolled 356 ESA-naive adult patients in 26 countries with low- to intermediate-risk MDS requiring RBC transfusions to manage anemia.  During the trial, 178 patients were randomized in each study arm to receive either luspatercept or epoetin alfa subcutaneously every three or one week, respectively, until either disease progression or 24 weeks without clinical benefit.  Patients will be followed up to 5 years; however, an interim analysis of 147 patients in the luspatercept arm and 154 in the epoetin alfa arm who had completed either 24 weeks of treatment or discontinued treatment suggest that luspatercept lowered RBC transfusion dependence and increased hemoglobin levels.  Specifically, 59% (86/147) of patients in the luspatercept arm reached transfusion independence for at least 12 weeks compared to 31% (48/154) of patients in the epoetin alfa arm (p<0.0001).  Safety profiles were similar between the two ESAs, but further safety analyses are needed as well as confirming these results in other subgroups of patients with MDS.

Reference:

Platzbecker U, Porta MGD, Santini V, Zeidan AM, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS):  interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial.  The Lancet 2023

Filed Under

  • News
  • RBC Transfusion
  • Special Transfusion Situations

Recommended

  • RBC Transfusions Are Best for Anemic Patients with Breast Cancer

  • Frequent Whole Blood Donations Not Associated with Cardiovascular Disease

  • VIDEO: Trial Evaluates Liberal vs. Restrictive Transfusion Approaches for Cardiac Surgery Patients

Show Comments

Comments on this article are closed.

Get the latest news. Subscribe to our mailing list. Sign Up

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • Directed Blood Donations Should be Limited

  • Babesia Infection Reduces Red Cell Deformability

  • New Erythropoietin Gene Variants Linked to Hereditary Erythrocytosis

  • Multifaceted Threats to the Blood Supply from Climate Change

    Question of the Day

    Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Privacy Policy

    Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies Wiley